Vascular therapeutics

ABSTRACT

The present invention provides a method of preventing or reducing restenosis, neointima formation, graft failure, atherosclerosis, angiogenesis and/or solid tumor growth in a subject The method comprises administering to the subject a prophylactically effective dose of a nucleic acid which decreases the level of c-Jun mRNA, c-Jun mRNA translation or nuclear accumulation or activity of c-Jun. It is preferred that the nucleic acid is a DNAzyme that targets c-Jun mRNA.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of International Patent ApplicationNo.: PCT/AU03/00237, filed on Feb. 27, 2003, which claims priority toAustralian Patent Application No.: PS 0780, filed on Feb. 27, 2002, thedisclosures of which are all herein incorporated by reference in theirentirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to methods and compositions for reducingor preventing c-Jun mediated cellular processes. In particular, thepresent invention relates to methods of reducing or preventing neointimaformation, atherosclerosis, restenosis, graft failure or angiogenesisinvolving the use of DNAzymes.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The initiating event in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis andrestenosis following angioplasty is injury to cells in the artery wall¹.Injury or stress stimulates signalling and transcriptional pathways invascular smooth muscle cells, stimulating their migration andproliferation and the eventual formation of a neointima. Smooth musclecell proliferation is a key feature of neointima formation,atherosclerosis, restenosis and graft failure.

c-Jun, a prototypical member of the basic region-leucine zipper proteinfamily, is transiently induced following arterial injury in animalmodels^(2,3). c-Jun forms both homodimers and heterodimers with otherbZIP proteins to form the AP-1 transcription factor. Whileinvestigations over the last decade have linked AP-1 with proliferation,tumorigenesis and apoptosis, AP-1 has also been implicated in tumorsuppression and cell differentiation⁴. Thus, gene-targeting strategiesthat down-regulate c-Jun expression do not necessarily inhibit cellproliferation.

Kanatani et al, (1996)⁵ have shown that antisense oligonucleotidestargeting c-Jun dose-dependently reduce the growth-inhibitory effect ofdexamethasone and TGFβ. Recent reports indicate that c-Jun NH₂-terminalkinase/stress activated protein kinase (JNK), an upstream activator ofc-Jun and numerous other transcription factors, is expressed by SMCs inhuman and rabbit atherosclerotic plaques^(6,7) and that dominantnegative JNK inhibits neointima formation after balloon injury⁸. c-Jun,however, has not been localised in human atherosclerotic lesions, norhas it been shown to play a functional role in arterial repair afterinjury.

It is clear, however, that the finding that c-Jun, or any other givengene, is inducibly expressed in the artery wall following balloonangioplasty does not necessarily translate to it playing a positiveregulatory role in transcription, proliferation or neointima formation.For example, it has been shown that three transcriptional repressors(NAB2, GCF2, and YY1) are activated in vascular smooth muscle cells bymechanical injury in vitro, as well as in the rat artery wall. NAB2directly binds the zinc finger transcription factor Egr-1 and repressesEgr-1-mediated transcription⁹. GCF2 is a potent repressor of theexpression of PDGF-A, a well-established mitogen for vascular smoothmuscle cells, and inhibits smooth muscle cell proliferation¹⁰.Similarly, YY1 overexpression blocks smooth muscle cell growth withoutaffecting endothelial cell proliferation¹¹.

c-Jun can repress, as well as activate transcription. c-Jun binds thecorepressor TG-interacting factor (TGIF) to suppress Smad2transcriptional activity¹². c-Jun also blocks transforming growth factorbeta-mediated transcription by repressing the transcriptional activityof Smad3¹³.

c-Jun can inhibit, as well as stimulate proliferation. Using antisenseoligonucleotides to c-Jun, Kanatani and colleagues demonstrated thatinhibition of human monocytoid leukemia cell growth by TGF-beta anddexamethasone is mediated by enhanced c-Jun expression⁵.

c-Jun, however, has not been directly linked to the complex process ofangiogenesis, which underlies many common human diseases including solidtumor growth and corneal disease. Angiogenesis is a complex multi-stepprocess involving proteolytic degradation of the basement membrane andsurrounding extracellular matrix, microvascular endothelial cellproliferation, migration, tube formation and structuralre-organisation¹⁴.

DNAzymes

In human gene therapy, antisense nucleic acid technology has been one ofthe major tools of choice to inactivate genes whose expression causesdisease and is thus undesirable. The anti-sense approach employs anucleic acid molecule that is complementary to, and thereby hybridizeswith, an mRNA molecule encoding an undesirable gene. Such hybridizationleads to the inhibition of gene expression by mechanisms includingnucleolytic degradation or steric blockade of the translationalmachinery.

Anti-sense technology suffers from certain drawbacks. Anti-sensehybridization results in the formation of a DNA/target mRNAheteroduplex. This heteroduplex serves as a substrate for RNAseH-mediated degradation of the target mRNA component. Here, the DNAanti-sense molecule serves in a passive manner, in that it merelyfacilitates the required cleavage by endogenous RNAse H enzyme. Thisdependence on RNAse H confers limitations on the design of anti-sensemolecules regarding their chemistry and ability to form stableheteroduplexes with their target mRNA's. Anti-sense DNA molecules alsosuffer from problems associated with non-specific activity and, athigher concentrations, even toxicity.

As an alternative to anti-sense molecules, catalytic nucleic acidmolecules have shown promise as therapeutic agents for suppressing geneexpression, and are widely discussed in the literature¹⁵⁻²¹. Thus,unlike a conventional anti-sense molecule, a catalytic nucleic acidmolecule functions by actually cleaving its target mRNA molecule insteadof merely binding to it. Catalytic nucleic acid molecules can onlycleave a target nucleic acid sequence if that target sequence meetscertain minimum requirements. The target sequence must be complementaryto the hybridizing regions of the catalytic nucleic acid, and the targetmust contain a specific sequence at the site of cleavage.

Catalytic RNA molecules (“ribozymes”) are well documented^(15,22,23),and have been shown to be capable of cleaving both RNA¹⁵ and DNA²⁰molecules. Indeed, the development of in vitro selection and evolutiontechniques has made it possible to obtain novel ribozymes against aknown substrate, using either random variants of a known ribozyme orrandom-sequence RNA as a starting point^(16,24,25).

Ribozymes, however, are highly susceptible to enzymatic hydrolysiswithin the cells where they are intended to perform their function. Thisin turn limits their pharmaceutical applications.

Recently, a new class of catalytic molecules called “DNAzymes” wascreated^(26,27). DNAzymes are single-stranded, and cleave bothRNA^(16,27) and DNA²¹. A general model for the DNAzyme has beenproposed, and is known as the “10-23” model. DNAzymes following the“10-23” model, also referred to simply as “10-23 DNAzymes”, have acatalytic domain of 15 deoxyribonucleotides, flanked by twosubstrate-recognition domains of variable deoxyribonucleotide armlength. In vitro analyses show that this type of DNAzyme can effectivelycleave its substrate RNA at purine:pyrimidine junctions underphysiological conditions²⁷.

DNAzymes show promise as therapeutic agents. However, DNAzyme successagainst a disease caused by the presence of a known mRNA molecule is notpredictable. This unpredictability is due, in part, to two factors.First, certain mRNA secondary structures can impede a DNAzyme's abilityto bind to and cleave its target mRNA. Second, the uptake of a DNAzymeby cells expressing the target mRNA may not be efficient enough topermit therapeutically meaningful results.

Investigation of the precise regulatory role of c-Jun in the injuredartery wall and indeed, in other disease settings such as angiogenesis,has been hampered by the lack of a specific pharmacological inhibitor.DNAzymes represent a new class of gene targeting agent with specificityconferred by the sequence of nucleotides in the two arms flanking acatalytic core²⁷, with advantages over ribozymes of substratespecificity and stability^(27,28). To date, neither c-Jun nor indeed anyother Jun family member has been targeted using catalytic nucleic acidstrategies.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present inventors have demonstrated using a DNAzyme targeting c-Jun,that c-Jun plays a positive role in restenosis, neointima formation,atherosclerosis, graft failure and angiogenesis.

In a first aspect the present invention consists in a method ofpreventing or reducing angiogenesis and/or neovascularisation in asubject, the method comprising administering to the subject aprophylactically effective dose of a nucleic acid which decreases thelevel of c-Jun mRNA, c-Jun mRNA translation or nuclear accumulation oractivity of c-Jun.

In a second aspect the present invention consists in a method oftreating or inhibiting a condition selected from the group consisting ofrestenosis, neointima formation, graft failure and atherosclerosis in asubject, the method comprising administering to the subject aprophylactically effective dose of a nucleic acid which decreases thelevel of c-Jun mRNA, c-Jun mRNA translation or nuclear accumulation oractivity of c-Jun.

In a third aspect the present invention consists in a method of treatingor inhibiting solid tumour growth in a subject, the method comprisingadministering to the subject a prophylactically effective dose of anucleic acid which decreases the level of c-Jun mRNA, c-Jun mRNAtranslation or nuclear accumulation or activity of c-Jun.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the nucleic acid isselected from the group consisting of a DNAzyme targeted against c-Jun,a c-Jun antisense oligonucleotide, a ribozyme targeted against c-Jun,and a ssDNA targeted against c-Jun dsDNA such that the ssDNA forms atriplex with the c-Jun dsDNA. In an alternative embodiment the nucleicacid is dsRNA targeted against c-Jun mRNA, a nucleic acid molecule whichresults in production of dsRNA targeted against c-Jun mRNA or smallinterfering RNA molecules targeted against c-Jun mRNA.

In a fourth aspect, the present invention provides a method of screeningfor an agent which inhibits restenosis, neointima formation, graftfailure, atherosclerosis, angiogenesis, and/or solid tumour growth themethod comprising testing a putative agent for the ability to inhibitinduction of c-Jun, decrease expression of c-Jun or decrease the nuclearaccumulation or activity of c-Jun.

In a fifth aspect, the present invention consists in a catalytic nucleicacid which specifically cleaves c-Jun mRNA in the region of residuesA287 to A1501.

In a sixth aspect the present invention consists in an antisenseoligonucleotide which specifically binds c-Jun mRNA in the region ofresidues U1296 to G1497.

In a seventh aspect the present invention consists in a pharmaceuticalcomposition comprising the catalytic nucleic acid of the fifth aspect ofthe invention or the antisense oligonucleotide of the sixth aspect ofthe invention and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

In an eighth aspect the present invention consists in an angioplasticstent for inhibiting onset of restenosis comprising an angioplasticstent operably coated with a prophylactically effective dose of anucleic acid which decreases the level of c-Jun mRNA, c-Jun mRNAtranslation or nuclear accumulation or activity of c-Jun.

In a ninth aspect, the present invention consists in a method forinhibiting the onset of restenosis, neointima formation, graft failureand/or atherosclerosis in a subject undergoing angioplasty comprisingtopically administering a stent according to the eighth aspect of theinvention to the subject at around the time of angioplasty.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES

FIG. 1. c-Jun and Sp1 expression in human atherosclerotic lesions.Immunohistochemical staining for c-Jun and Sp1 in 5 μm sections of humancarotid atherosclerotic lesions. The intima and media are indicated inthe figure. Staining is representative of three independent samples.

FIG. 2. Cleavage of in vitro transcribed c-Jun RNA and inhibition ofc-Jun induction by c-Jun DNAzymes. a, Representation of DNAzyme cleavagesites (arrows) in c-Jun RNA and sizes of expected products. The specificpurine hosting the 3′ cleavage is indicated for each candidate DNAzyme.Numbering is based on the human c-Jun complete cds (Accession J04111,NID g186624). The expression vector used for the T7 RNApolymerase-dependent generation of c-Jun RNA is indicated. b, Integrityanalysis of DNAzyme (34 nt) (upper panel) and 668 nt c-Jun RNA (middlepanel) and panning or nucleolytic activity of candidate DNAzymes after 1h at 37° C. (lower panel). DNAzyme integrity was determined by 5′-endlabelling with γ³²P-dATP and T4 RNA polymerase prior to resolution on12% denaturing polyacrylamide gels. Transcript integrity was determinedby random labelling with α³²P-UTP and T7 polynucleotide kinase prior toresolution on 12% denaturing polyacrylamide gels. The figure shows the668 nt transcript after the reaction was allowed to proceed for thetimes indicated. Subsequent experiments used the 30 min run-off. c,Time- and dose-dependence of Dz13 cleavage of c-Jun RNA. The 474 and 194nt products are indicated. d, Western blot analysis for c-Jun protein.Extracts of smooth muscle cells (10 μg) transfected with 0.5 μM ofDNAzyme (Dz13 or Dz13scr) were assessed for c-Jun immunoreactivity (39kDa) using rabbit polyclonal anti-peptide antibodies (Santa CruzBiotechnology). The Coomassie blue-stain gel shows unbiased loading.

FIG. 3. c-Jun DNAzyme inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation, a,Schematic representation of c-Jun DNAzyme Dz13 and target site (G¹³¹¹T)in human c-Jun mRNA (upper panel), comparison of Dz13 target site inhuman, porcine and rat c-Jun mRNA (middle panel), and comparison of As13and Dz13 (lower panel). The translational start site of human c-Jun mRNAis located at A¹²⁶¹TG. (SEQ ID NOS:13, 22, 13, 19, 20, 21, 22). b,Effect of c-Jun DNAzymes (0.5 μM) on serum-inducible primary humansmooth muscle cell (HASMC) proliferation inhibited by Dz13 . Sequence ofDz13scr is 5′-GCG ACG TGA GGC TAG CTA CAA CGA GTG GAG GAG X-3′ (SEQ IDNO:2), where X is a 3′-3′-linked inverted T. c, Serum-inducible porcinesmooth muscle cell proliferation (PASMC) inhibited by 0.5 μM of Dz13. d,Human smooth muscle cell proliferation is inhibited by Dz13 and As13 ina dose-dependent manner. The concentrations of DNAzyme (0.1-0.4 μM) areindicated in the figure. The sequence of As13scr is 5′-GCG ACG TGA C GTGGAG GAG X-3′, where X is a 3′3′-linked inverted T (SEQ ID NO:3).

FIG. 4. c-Jun DNAzyme inhibition of smooth muscle cell repair. Smoothmuscle cell regrowth in the denuded zone three days after scraping andtransfection with 0.5 μM of Dz13 or Dz13scr. The cells were fixed andstained with hematoxylin and eosin prior to micrography.

FIG. 5. Blockade of neointimal thickening in rat common carotidarteries. a, Neointima/media ratios for each group (vehicle alone,vehicle containing Dz13, vehicle containing Dz13scr) 21d after injury. *indicates P<0.05 compared with vehicle and vehicle containing Dz13scrgroups using Student's t-test. The vehicle and vehicle containingDz13scr groups were not statistically different. b, Representativecross-sections stained with haematoxylin-eosin. N and single linedenotes neointima, M and triple line denotes media, arrow denotespreinjured intima. Thrombosis was occasionally observed and not confinedto any particular group. c, Immunoperoxidase staining for c-Jun proteinsix hours after arterial injury. d, Immunoperoxidase staining for Sp1six hours after arterial injury. DNAzyme in vehicle (FuGENE6, MgCl₂,PBS, pH 7.4) was applied to the carotid in Pluronic gel (BASF) at thetime of injury. Three weeks subsequently the arteries wereperfusion-fixed and 5 μm sections taken for immunohistochemical andmorphometric analysis.

FIG. 6. Dz13 inhibits microvascular endothelial microtubule formation onreconstituted basement membranes. HMEC-1 cells, transfected previouslywith the indicated concentrations of Dz13 and Dz13scr, were plated into96 wps containing matrigel and tubule formation was quantitated after 8h. Asterisk indicates p<0.05 by Student's t-test relative to control.Western and EMSA revealed that Dz13 inhibits c-Jun expression andDNA-binding activity in microvascular endothelial cells (data notshown). (FBS denotes foetal bovine serum)

FIG. 7. A, c-Jun cDNA sequence (Accession J04111, NID g186624) (SEQ IDNO:1). B, Location of DNAzyme target sites in c-Jun mRNA (SEQ ID NO:33).(SEQ ID NO: 23: hybridising arms of the DNAzyme (9+9 nt) Dz9 (A1261).SEQ ID NO: 24: hybridising arms of the DNAzyme (9+9 nt) Dz10 (A1273).SEQ ID NO: 25: hybridising arms of the DNAzyme (9+9 nt) Dz11 (A1289).SEQ ID NO: 26: hybridising arms of the DNAzyme (9+9 nt) Dz12 (A1295).SEQ ID NO: 27: hybridising arms of the DNAzyme (9+9 nt) Dz13 (G1311).SEQ ID NO: 28: hybridising arms of the DNAzyme (9+9 nt) Dz14 (A1498).SEQ ID NO: 29 hybridising arms of the DNAzyme (9+9 nt) DZ15 (A1501).)

FIG. 8. Dz13 inhibits microvascular endothelial cell proliferation. A,Growth-quiescent HMEC-1 cells pre-treated with DNAzyme (0.2 μM) wereexposed to serum and total cell counts were determined after 3 daysusing a Coulter counter. B, Dz13 inhibition of microvascular endothelialcell proliferation is dose-dependent. C, Effect of Dz13 variants(shorter and longer arm length) on proliferation. Sequences ofDz13(11+11), Dz13(10+10) and Dz13(8+8) are 5′-GA CGG GAG GAA ggc tag ctacaa cga GAG GCG TTG AG-Ti-3′ (SEQ ID NO:7), 5′-A CGG GAG GAA ggc tag ctacaa cga GAG GCG TTG A-Ti-3′ (SEQ ID NO:8) and 5′-GG GAG GAA ggc tag ctacaa cga GAG GCG TT-Ti-3′ (SEQ ID NO:9), respectively. Sequences ofDz13(11+11)scr, Dz13(10+10)scr and Dz13(8+8)scr are 5′-GA GCG ACG TGAggc tag cta caa cga GTG GAG GAG AG-Ti-3′ (SEQ ID NO:10), 5′-A GCG ACGTGA ggc tag cta caa cga GTG GAG GAG A-Ti-3′ (SEQ ID NO:11) and 5′-CG ACGTGA ggc tag cta caa cga GTG GAG GA-Ti-3′, respectively (SEQ ID NO:12).Ti is a 3′-3′-linked inverted T. Asterisk indicates p<0.05 by Student'st-test relate to control. FIG. 9. Dz13 inhibits microvascularendothelial regrowth after scraping in vitro and migration in modifiedBoyden chambers. A, Growth-quiescent HMEC-1 cells pre-treated withDNAzyme (0.2, 0.3 or 0.4 μM) were scraped and the number of cells in thedenuded zone was quantitated under microscopy. B, HMEC-1 were plated inmodified Boyden chambers coated with matrigel or collagen type I(chemoattractant in lower chamber was FGF-2, 20 ng/ml) and the number ofcells on the underside of the membrane was quantitated after 24 h.Asterisk indicates p<0.05 by Student's t-test relative to control.

FIG. 10. Dz13 blocks MMP-2 expression and proteolysis. MMP-2 proteinexpression was quantitated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.Endothelial cells transfected with DNAzyme were incubated with 10 ng/mlTGF-betal for 2 days in medium supplemented with 0.1% FBS. Conditionedmedia was harvested, centrifuged, normalized for equal protein, andlevels of MMP-2 determined using commercial ELISA (AmershamBiosciences).

FIG. 11. Dz13 inhibits VEGF165-induced neovascularization in rat cornea.A, HMEC-1 cells (pre-transfected with 0.4 μM Dz13, and in mediumcontaining 200 ng/ml of VEGF165) were plated into 96wps containingmatrigel and tubule formation was quantitated under microscopy after 8h. Quantitation of B, the number of blood vessels in the rat cornea andC, the corneal surface area occupied by these new vessels. Asteriskindicates p<0.05 by Student's t-test relative to control.

FIG. 12. Dz13 blockade of solid melanoma growth in mice. A, Dz13inhibition of solid malignant B16 tumor growth in a sequence-specificmanner. Tumour volumes were evaluated as indicated on the x-axis. B,Mean total body weight in the DNAzyme and vehicle-treated cohorts. C,Proliferation 2 days after exposure of growth-quiescent culturedmicrovascular endothelial cells pre-treated with DNAzyme (0.4 μM) toserum. Seventeen of the 18 nucleotides in the Dz13 target site in humanc-Jun mRNA (5′-CAA CGC CUC G1311 | UUC CUC CcG-3′) (SEQ ID NO:30) areconserved in murine c-Jun mRNA (5′-CAA CGC CUC G | UUC CUC CaG-3′) (SEQID NO:14). Asterisk indicates p<0.05 by Student's t-test relative tocontrol. Immunohistochemical analysis in vascularized human malignantcutaneous melanoma tissue revealed that c-Jun and MMP-2 are expressed inCD31+ endothelium and surrounding melanoma cells (data not shown).Western blot analysis demonstrated Dz13 inhibition of c-Jun protein 2 hafter exposure of the cells to serum (data not shown).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present inventors have demonstrated c-Jun expression by smoothmuscle cells in the human atheromatous lesion (FIG. 1). c-Jun is poorly,if at all, expressed by smooth muscle cells in the normal media. Incontrast, the zinc finger transcription factor Sp1 is expressed in boththe intima and media (FIG. 1).

Neointima formation is a characteristic feature of common vascularpathologies, such as atherosclerosis and post-angioplasty restenosis,and involves smooth muscle cell proliferation.

In addition to its expression by smooth muscle cells, the presentinventors have also demonstrated that c-Jun is linked to the complexprocess of angiogenesis. In particular, expression of c-Jun was found invascularized primary human melanoma which has not been previouslydescribed.

A gene-specific DNAzyme targeting c-Jun (designated Dz13) was generated.Dz13 cleaves c-Jun RNA and inhibits inducible c-Jun protein expressionin vascular smooth muscle cells with a potency exceeding its exactnon-catalytic antisense oligodeoxynucleotide equivalent. Moreover, Dz13abrogated smooth muscle cell repair after injury in vitro and neointimaformation in rat carotid arteries in vivo.

Dz13 also blocked endothelial proliferation, migration and microtubuleformation with a potency exceeding its exact non-catalytic antisenseoligodeoxynucleotide equivalent. It inhibited neovascularisation in ratcornea and melanoma growth in mice.

These findings demonstrate the pivotal regulatory role of c-Jun inneointima formation in the injured artery wall, as well as angiogenesis.

In a first aspect the present invention consists in a method ofpreventing or reducing angiogenesis and/or neovascularisation in asubject, the method comprising administering to the subject aprophylactically effective dose of a nucleic acid which decreases thelevel of c-Jun mRNA, c-Jun mRNA translation or nuclear accumulation oractivity of c-Jun.

In a second aspect the present invention consists in a method oftreating or inhibiting a condition selected from the group consisting ofrestenosis, neointima formation, graft failure and atherosclerosis in asubject, the method comprising administering to the subject aprophylactically effective dose of a nucleic acid which decreases thelevel of c-Jun mRNA, c-Jun mRNA translation or nuclear accumulation oractivity of c-Jun.

In a third aspect the present invention consists in a method of treatingor inhibiting solid tumour growth in a subject, the method comprisingadministering to the subject a prophylactically effective dose of anucleic acid which decreases the level of c-Jun mRNA, c-Jun mRNAtranslation or nuclear accumulation or activity of c-Jun.

In a preferred embodiment of the first aspect of the invention theangiogenesis is ocular angiogenesis.

In a preferred embodiment of the third aspect of the invention the solidtumour is melanoma.

Although the subject may be any animal or human, it is preferred thatthe subject is a human.

As will be recognised by those skilled in this field there are a numberof means by which the method of the present invention-may be achieved.

In a preferred embodiment, the method is achieved by cleavage of c-JunmRNA by a sequence-specific DNAzyme. In a further preferred embodiment,the DNAzyme comprises

-   -   (i) a catalytic domain which cleaves mRNA at a        purine:pyrimindine cleavage site;    -   (ii) a first binding domain contiguous with the 5′ end of the        catalytic domain; and    -   (iii) a second binding domain contiguous with the 3′ end of the        catalytic domain,    -   wherein the binding domains are sufficiently complementary to        two regions immediately flanking a purine:pyrimidine cleavage        site within the c-Jun mRNA such that the DNAzyme cleaves the        c-Jun mRNA.

As used herein, “DNAzyme” means a DNA molecule that specificallyrecognizes and cleaves a distinct target nucleic acid sequence, whichmay be either DNA or RNA.

In a preferred embodiment, the binding domains of the DNAzyme arecomplementary to the regions immediately flanking the cleavage site. Itwill be appreciated by those skilled in the art, however, that strictcomplementarity may not be required for the DNAzyme to bind to andcleave the c-Jun mRNA.

The binding domain lengths (also referred to herein as “arm lengths”)can be of any permutation, and can be the same or different. In apreferred embodiment, the binding domain lengths are at least 6nucleotides. Preferably, both binding domains have a combined totallength of at least 14 nucleotides. Various permutations in the length ofthe two binding domains, such as 7+7, 8+8 and 9+9, are envisioned.Preferably, the length of the two binding domains are 9+9.

The catalytic domain of a DNAzyme of the present invention may be anysuitable catalytic domain. Examples of suitable catalytic domains aredescribed in Santoro and Joyce, 1997²⁷ and U.S. Pat. No. 5,807,718. In apreferred embodiment, the catalytic domain has the nucleotide sequenceGGCTAGCTACAACGA (SEQ ID NO:4).

It is preferred that the DNAzyme cleavage site is within the region ofresidues A287 to A1501, more preferably U1296 to G1497, of the c-JunmRNA. It is particularly preferred that the cleavage site within thec-Jun mRNA is the GU site corresponding to nucleotides 1311-1312.

In a further preferred embodiment, the DNAzyme has the sequence

(SEQ. ID NO: 5) 5′-cgggaggaaGGCTAGCTACAACGAgaggcgttg-3′.

In applying DNAzyme-based treatments, it is preferable that the DNAzymesbe as stable as possible against degradation in the intra-cellularmilieu. One means of accomplishing this is by incorporating a 3′-3′inversion at one or more termini of the DNAzyme. More specifically, a3′-3′ inversion (also referred to herein simply as an “inversion”) meansthe covalent phosphate bonding between the 3′ carbons of the terminalnucleotide and its adjacent nucleotide. This type of bonding is opposedto the normal phosphate bonding between the 3′ and 5′ carbons ofadjacent nucleotides, hence the term “inversion”. Accordingly, in apreferred embodiment, the 3′-end nucleotide residue is inverted in thebuilding domain contiguous with the 3′ end of the catalytic domain. Inaddition to inversions, the instant DNAzymes may contain modifiednucleotides. Modified nucleotides include, for example, N3′-P5′phosphoramidate linkages, and peptide-nucleic acid linkages. These arewell known in the art.

In a particularly preferred embodiment, the DNAzyme includes an invertedT at the 3′ position.

In order to increase resistance to exonucleolytic degradation andhelical thermostability locked nucleic acid analogues can be produced.Further information regarding these analogues is provided in Vester etal, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 13682-13683, the disclosure of whichis incorporated herein by cross reference.

In another embodiment, the method is achieved by inhibiting translationof the c-Jun mRNA using synthetic antisense DNA molecules that do notact as a substrate for RNase and act by sterically blocking geneexpression.

In another embodiment, the method is achieved by inhibiting translationof the c-Jun mRNA by destabilising the mRNA using synthetic antisenseDNA molecules that act by directing the RNase degradation of the c-JunmRNA present in the heteroduplex formed between the antisense DNA andmRNA.

In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the antisenseoligonucleotide comprises a sequence which hybridises to c-Jun withinthe region of residues U1296 to G1497.

It will be understood that the antisense oligonucleotide need nothybridise to this whole region. It is preferred that the antisenseoligonucleotide has the sequence CGGGAGGAACGAGGCGTTG (SEQ ID NO:6).

In another embodiment, the method is achieved by inhibiting translationof the c-Jun mRNA by cleavage of the mRNA by sequence-specifichammerhead ribozymes and derivatives of the hammerhead ribozyme such asthe Minizymes or Mini-ribozymes or where the ribozyme is derived from:

-   -   (i) the hairpin ribozyme,    -   (ii) the Tetrahymena Group I intron,    -   (iii) the Hepatitis Delta Viroid ribozyme or    -   (iv) the Neurospera ribozyme.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the compositionof the ribozyme may be;

-   -   (i) made entirely of RNA,    -   (ii) made of RNA and DNA bases, or    -   (iii) made of RNA or DNA and modified bases, sugars and        backbones

Within the context of the present invention, the ribozyme may also beeither;

-   -   (i) entirely synthetic or    -   (ii) contained within a transcript from a gene delivered within        a virus-derived vector, expression plasmid, a synthetic gene,        homologously or heterologously integrated into the patients        genome or delivered into cells ex vivo, prior to reintroduction        of the cells of the patient, using one of the above methods.

It is preferred that the ribozyme cleaves the c-Jun mRNA in the regionof residues U1296 to G1497.

In another embodiment, the method is achieved by inhibition of theability of the c-Jun gene to bind to its target DNA by expression of anantisense c-Jun mRNA.

In a still further embodiment the nucleic acid is dsRNA targeted againstc-Jun mRNA, a nucleic acid molecule which results in production of dsRNAtargeted against c-Jun mRNA or small interfering RNA molecules targetedagainst c-Jun mRNA. So called “RNA interference” or “RNAi” is well knownand further information regarding RNAi is provided in Hannon, Nature,Vol 418, 2002, 24251, and McManus et al, Nature Reviews: Genetics, Vol3, 2002,737-747, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein bycross-reference.

In one embodiment, the method is achieved by targeting the c-Jun genedirectly using triple helix (triplex) methods in which a ssDNA moleculecan bind to the dsDNA and prevent transcription.

In another embodiment, the method is achieved by inhibitingtranscription of the c-Jun gene using nucleic acid transcriptionaldecoys. Linear sequences can be designed that form a partialintramolecular duplex which encodes a binding site for a definedtranscriptional factor.

In another embodiment, the method is achieved by inhibition of c-Junactivity as a transcription factor using transcriptional decoy methods.

In another embodiment, the method is achieved by inhibition of theability of the c-Jun gene to bind to its target DNA by drugs that havepreference for GC rich sequences. Such drugs include nogalamycin,hedamycin and chromomycin A3²⁹.

Administration of the inhibitory nucleic acid may be effected orperformed using any of the various methods and delivery systems known tothose skilled in the art. The administering can be performed, forexample, intravenously, orally, via implant, transmucosally,transdermally, topically, intramuscularly, subcutaneously orextracorporeally. In addition, the instant pharmaceutical compositionsideally contain one or more routinely used pharmaceutically acceptablecarriers. Such carriers are well known to those skilled in the art. Thefollowing delivery systems, which employ a number of routinely usedcarriers, are only representative of the many embodiments envisioned foradministering the instant composition. In one embodiment the deliveryvehicle contains Mg²⁺ or other cation(s) to serve as co-factor(s) forefficient DNAzyme bioactivity.

Transdermal delivery systems include patches, gels, tapes and creams,and can contain excipients such as solubilizers, permeation enhancers(e.g., fatty acids, fatty acid esters, fatty alcohols and amino adds),hydrophilic polymers (e.g., polycarbophil and polyvinylpyrolidone), andadhesives and tackifiers (e.g., polyisobutylenes, silicone-basedadhesives, acrylates and polybutene).

Transmucosal delivery systems include patches, tablets, suppositories,pessaries, gels and creams, and can contain excipients such assolubilizers and enhancers (e.g., propylene glycol, bile salts and aminoadds), and other vehicles (e.g., polyethylene glycol, fatty add estersand derivatives, and hydrophilic polymers such ashydroxypropylmethylcellulose and hyaluronic acid).

Oral delivery systems include tablets and capsules. These can containexcipients such as binders (e.g., hydroxypropylmethylcellulose,polyvinyl pyrilodone, other cellulosic materials and starch), diluents(e.g., lactose and other sugars, starch, dicalcium phosphate andcellulosic materials), disintegrating agents (e.g., starch polymers andcellulosic materials) and lubricating agents (e.g., stearates and talc).

Solutions, suspensions and powders for reconstitutable delivery systemsinclude vehicles such as suspending agents (e.g., gums, xanthans,cellulosics and sugars), humectants (e.g., sorbitol), solubilizers(e.g., ethanol, water, PEG and propylene glycol), surfactants (e.g.,sodium lauryl sulfate, Spans, Tweens, and cetyl pyridine), preservativesand antioxidants (e.g., parabens, vitamins E and C, and ascorbic acid),anti-caking agents, coating agents, and chelating agents (e.g., EDTA).

Topical delivery systems include, for example, gels and solutions, andcan contain excipients such as solubilizers, permeation enhancers (e.g.,fatty acids, fatty add esters, fatty alcohols and amino acids), andhydrophilic polymers (e.g., polycarbophil and polyvinylpyrolidone). Inthe preferred embodiment, the pharmaceutically acceptable carrier is aliposome or a biodegradable polymer. Examples of carriers which can beused in this invention include the following: (1) Fugene6® (Roche); (2)SUPERFECT®(Qiagen); (3) Lipofectamine 2000®(GIBCO BRL); (4) CellFectin,1:1.5 (M/M) liposome formulation of the cationic lipidN,NI,NII,NIII-tetramethyl-N,NI,NII,NIII-tetrapalmitylspermine anddioleoyl phosphatidyl-ethanolamine (DOPE)(GIBCO BRL); (5) CytofectinGSV, 2:1 (M/M) liposome formulation of a cationic lipid and DOPE (GlenResearch); (6) DOTAP(N-[1-(2,3-dioleoyloxy)-N,N,N-trimethyl-ammoniummethylsulfate)(Boehringer Mannheim); and (7) Lipofectamine, 3:1 (M/M) liposomeformulation of the polycationic lipid DOSPA and the neutral lipid DOPE(GIBCO BRL).

Delivery of the nucleic acids described may also be achieved via one ormore, of the following non-limiting examples of vehicles:

-   -   (a) liposomes and liposome-protein conjugates and mixtures;    -   (b) non-liposomal lipid and cationic lipid formulations;    -   (c) activated dendrimer formulations;    -   (d) within a polymer formulation such as polyethylenimine (PEI)        or pluronic gels or within ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer        (EVAc). The polymer is preferably delivered intra-luminally;    -   (e) within a viral-liposome complex, such as Sendai virus;    -   (f) as a peptide-DNA conjugate;    -   (g) using catheters to deliver intra-luminal formulations of the        nucleic acid as a solution or in a complex with a liposome;    -   (h) catheter delivery to adventitial tissue as a solution or in        a complex with a liposome;    -   (i) the nucleic acid may be bound to a delivery agent such as a        targeting moiety, or any suitable carrier such as a peptide or        fatty acid molecule;    -   (j) the nucleic acid may be delivered by a double angioplasty        balloon device fixed to catheter; or    -   (k) the nucleic acid could be delivered on a specially prepared        stent of the Schatz-Palmaz or derivative type. The stent could        be coated with a polymer or agent impregnated with nucleic acid        that allows controlled release of the molecules at the vessel        wall.

Determining the prophylactically effective dose of the instantpharmaceutical composition can be done based on animal data usingroutine computational methods. In one embodiment, the prophylacticallyeffective does contains between about 0.1 mg and about 1 g of theinstant DNAzyme. In another embodiment, the prophylactically effectivedose contains between about 1 mg and about 100 mg of the instantDNAzyme. In a further embodiment, the prophylactically effective doescontains between about 10 mg and about 50 mg of the instant DNAzyme. Inyet a further embodiment, the prophylactically effective does containsabout 25 mg of the instant DNAzyme.

In the case of the prevention or reduction of angiogenesis or inhibitionof solid tumour growth, in a preferred embodiment, the agent is injectedinto or proximal the tumour. Injectable drug delivery systems includesolutions, suspensions, gels, microspheres and polymeric injectables,and can comprise excipients such as solubility-altering agents (e.g.,ethanol, propylene glycol and sucrose) and polymers (e.g.,polycaprylactones and PLGA's). Implantable systems include rods anddiscs, and can contain excipients such as PLGA and polycaprylactone.

It is also envisaged that nucleic acid agents targeting c-Jun may beadministered by ex vivo transfection of cell suspensions, therebyinhibiting angiogenesis.

In a fourth aspect, the present invention provides a method of screeningfor an agent which inhibits restenosis, neointima formation,atherosclerosis, graft failure and/or angiogenesis, the methodcomprising testing a putative agent for the ability to inhibit inductionof c-Jun, decrease expression of c-Jun or decrease the nuclearaccumulation or activity of c-Jun.

The putative agent may be tested for the ability to inhibit c-Jun by anysuitable means. For example, the test may involve contacting a cellwhich expresses c-Jun with the putative agent and monitoring theproduction of c-Jun mRNA (by, for example, Northern blot analysis) orc-Jun protein (by, for example, immunohistochemical analysis or Westernblot analysis or electrophoretic mobility shift assay). Other suitabletests will be known to those skilled in the art.

In a fifth aspect the present invention consists in a catalytic nucleicacid which specifically cleaves c-Jun mRNA in the region of residuesA287 to A1501, preferably U1296 to G1497.

In a preferred embodiment, the catalytic nucleic acid is asequence-specific DNAzyme comprising

-   -   (i) a catalytic domain which cleaves mRNA at a purine:pyrimidine        cleavage site;    -   (ii) a first binding domain contiguous with the 5′ end of the        catalytic domain; and    -   (iii) a second binding domain contiguous with the 3′ end of the        catalytic domain,    -   wherein the binding domains are sufficiently complementary to        two regions immediately flanking a purine:pyrimidine cleavage        site within the c-Jun mRNA such that the DNAzyme cleaves the        c-Jun mRNA in the region of residues U1296 to G1497.

It is particularly preferred that the cleavage site within the c-JunmRNA is the GU site corresponding to nucleotides 1311-1312.

In a preferred embodiment, the binding domains of the DNAzyme arecomplementary to the regions immediately flanking the cleavage site. Itwill be appreciated by those skilled in the art, however, that strictcomplementarity may not be required for the DNAzyme to bind to andcleave the c-Jun mRNA.

The binding domain lengths (also referred to herein as “arm lengths”)can be of any permutation, and can be the same or different. In apreferred embodiment, the binding domain lengths are at least 6nucleotides. Preferably, both binding domains have a combined totallength of at least 14 nucleotides. Various permutations in the length ofthe two binding domains, such as 7+7, 8+8 and 9+9, are envisioned.Preferably, the length of the two binding domains are 9+9.

The catalytic domain of a DNAzyme of the present invention may be anysuitable catalytic domain. Examples of suitable catalytic domains aredescribed in Santoro and Joyce, 1997²⁷ and U.S. Pat. No. 5,807,718. In apreferred embodiment, the catalytic domain has the nucleotide sequenceGGCTAGCTACAACGA.

In a further preferred embodiment, the DNAzyme has the sequence

(SEQ. ID NO: 5) 5′-cgggaggaaGGCTAGCTACAACGAgaggcgttg-3′.

In applying DNAzyme-based treatments, it is preferable that the DNAzymesbe as stable as possible against degradation in the intra-cellularmilieu. One means of accomplishing this is by incorporating a 3′-3′inversion at one or more termini of the DNAzyme. More specifically, a3′-3′ inversion (also referred to herein simply as an “inversion”) meansthe covalent phosphate bonding between the 3′ carbons of the terminalnucleotide and its adjacent nucleotide. This type of bonding is opposedto the normal phosphate bonding between the 3′ and 5′ carbons ofadjacent nucleotides, hence the term “inversion”. Accordingly, in apreferred embodiment, the 3′-end nucleotide residue is inverted in thebuilding domain contiguous with the 3′ end of the catalytic domain. Inaddition to inversions, the instant DNAzymes may contain modifiednucleotides. Modified nucleotides include, for example, N3′-P5′phosphoramidate linkages, and peptide-nucleic acid linkages. These arewell known in the art.

In a particularly preferred embodiment, the DNAzyme includes an invertedT at the 3′ position.

In another embodiment, the catalytic nucleic acid is a sequence-specifichammerhead ribozyme and derivatives of the hammerhead ribozyme such asthe Minizymes or Mini-ribozymes or where the ribozyme is derived from:

-   -   (i) the hairpin ribozyme,    -   (ii) the Tetrahymena Group I intron,    -   (iii) the Hepatitis Delta Viroid ribozyme or    -   (iv) the Neurospera ribozyme        wherein the ribozyme cleaves the c-Jun mRNA in the region of        residues U1296 to G1497.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the compositionof the ribozyme may be;

-   -   (i) made entirely of RNA,    -   (ii) made of RNA and DNA bases, or    -   (iii) made of RNA or DNA and modified bases, sugars and        backbones.

Within the context of the present invention, the ribozyme may also beeither;

-   -   (i) entirely synthetic or    -   (ii) contained within a transcript from a gene delivered within        a virus-derived vector, expression plasmid, a synthetic gene,        homologously or heterologously integrated into the patients        genome or delivered into cells ex vivo, prior to reintroduction        of the cells of the patient, using one of the above methods.

In a sixth aspect the present invention consists in an antisenseoligonucleotide which specifically binds c-Jun mRNA in the region ofresidues U1296 to G1497.

It will be understood that the antisense oligonucleotide need nothybridise to this whole region. It is preferred that the antisenseoligonucleotide has the sequence CGGGAGGAACGAGGCGTTG (SEQ ID NO:6).

In a seventh aspect the present invention consists in a pharmaceuticalcomposition comprising the catalytic nucleic acid of the fifth aspect ofthe invention or the antisense oligonucleotide of the sixth aspect ofthe invention and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

In an eighth aspect the present invention consists in an angioplasticstent for inhibiting onset of restenosis comprising an angioplasticstent operably coated with a prophylactically effective dose of anucleic acid which decreases the level of c-Jun mRNA, c-Jun mRNAtranslation or nuclear accumulation or activity of c-Jun.

It is preferred that the agent is the catalytic nucleic acid of thefifth aspect of the invention or the antisense oligonucleotide of thesixth aspect of the invention

In a ninth aspect the present invention consists in a method forinhibiting the onset of restenosis in a subject undergoing angioplastycomprising topically administering a stent according to the eighthaspect of the invention to the subject at around the time ofangioplasty.

Angioplastic stents, also known by other terms such as “intravascularstents” or simple “stents”, are well known in the art. They areroutinely used to prevent vascular closure due to physical anomaliessuch as unwanted inward growth of vascular tissue due to surgicaltrauma. They often have a tubular, expanding lattice-type structureappropriate for their function, and can optionally be biodegradable.

In this invention, the stent can be operably coated with the instantpharmaceutical composition using any suitable means known in the art.Here, “operably coating” a stent means coating it in a way that permitsthe timely release of the pharmaceutical composition into thesurrounding tissue to be treated once the coated stent is administered.Such coating methods, for example, can use the polymer polypyrrole.

As used herein, administration “at around the time of angioplasty” canbe performed during the procedure, or immediately before or after theprocedure. The administering can be performed according to known methodssuch as catheter delivery.

Throughout this specification the word “comprise”, or variations such as“comprises” or “comprising”, will be understood to imply the inclusionof a stated element, integer or step, or group of elements, integers orsteps, but not the exclusion of any other element, integer or step, orgroup of elements, integers or steps.

All publications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporatedby reference.

Any discussion of documents, acts, materials, devices, articles or thelike which has been included in the present specification is solely forthe purpose of providing a context for the present invention. It is notto be taken as an admission that any or all of these matters form partof the prior art base or were common general knowledge in the fieldrelevant to the present invention as it existed in Australia before thepriority date of each claim of this application.

In order that the nature of the present invention may be more clearlyunderstood, preferred forms thereof will now be described with referenceto the following non-limiting and Examples.

Methods

DNAzymes, in vitro Transcript and Cleavage Experiments

DNAzymes were synthesized by Oligos Etc. or TriLink with a 3′-3′-linkedinverted T and purified by HPLC. A ³²P-labeled 668 nt c-Jun RNAtranscript was prepared by in vitro transcription (using T7 polymerase)of pBluescript containing the insert, cut previously with XbaI.Reactions were performed in a total volume of 20 μl containing 10 mMMgCl₂, 5 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 pmol of in vitro transcribedsubstrate and 10 pmol DNAzyme, unless dose-dependent cleavageexperiments were performed, where stoichiometry is indicated in thefigure. Reactions were allowed to proceed for various times at 37° C.and quenched by transferring an aliquot to tubes containing formamideloading buffer. Samples were run on 12% denaturing polyacrylamide gelsand autoradiographed overnight at −80° C.

Smooth Muscle Cell Culture, Transfection, Proliferation and WoundingAssays

Smooth muscle cells derived from human and porcine coronary arterieswere obtained from Cell Applications, Inc (San Diego, Calif.), andcultured in Waymouth's medium, pH 7.4, containing 10% fetal bovineserum, 50 μg/ml streptomycin and 50 IU/ml penicillin at 37° C. in ahumidified atmosphere of 5% CO₂. In all in vitro experiments, smoothmuscle cells were not used beyond passage 7. Transfections wereperformed in smooth muscle cells six h after the change of medium toserum-free, and again at the time of serum-stimulation 24 h after thestart of arrest, using FuGENE6 according to the manufacturer'sinstructions (Roche). In proliferation assays, growth-arrested smoothmuscle cells in 96 well plates (Nunc-InterMed) were transfected with theindicated concentration of DNAzyme or oligonucleotide, then exposed to5% FBS at 37° C. for 72 h. The cells were trypsinized and the suspensionquantitated in an automated Coulter counter. In wounding assays,confluent smooth muscle cells in chamber slides (Nunc-InterMed)transfected with DNAzyme were injured by scraping with a steriletoothpick. Cells were treated with mitomycin C (Sigma) (20 μM) for 2 hprior to injury to block proliferation. Seventy-two h after injury, thecells were washed with PBS, pH 7.4, fixed with formaldehyde and stainedwith hematoxylin and eosin.

Antibodies

Western immunoblot, and immunohistochemical analysis on human carotidendarterectomy specimens, were performed using rabbit polyconalanti-peptide antibodies targeting c-Jun and Sp1 (Santa CruzBiotechnology) essentially as described^(11,30).

Common Carotid Injury and Evaluation of Neointima Formation

Sprague Dawley rats (450 g males) were anaesthetised using ketamine (60mg/kg, i.p.) and xylazine (8 mg/kg, i.p.). The left common and externalcarotid arteries were exposed via a midline neck incision, and aligature was applied to the external carotid proximal to thebifurcation. Two hundred μl (at 4° C.) containing DNAzyme (750 μg), ofFuGENE6 (30 μl), MgCl₂ (1 mM) and P127 Pluronic gel (BASF) was appliedaround the vessel, 6 h prior to and again at the time of ligation. Thesolution gelified after contact with the vessel at 37° C. The incisionwas sutured and the rats allowed to recover. Animals were sacrificed 21days after injury by lethal injection of ketamine/xylazine, andperfusion fixed with 10% (v:v) formaldehyde at 120 mm Hg. Carotids wereplaced in 10% formaldehyde, embedded in 3% (w:v) agarose, fixed inparaffin and sectioned 1000 μm from the tie. Neointimal and medial areasin 5 μm sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin were determinedmorphometrically and expressed as a mean ratio per group of 6 rats.

Endothelial Cell Culture and Transfection

Human microvascular endothelial cells-1 (HMEC-1) were grown in MCDB131medium (GIBCO BRL) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mML-glutamine, 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor, 1 μg/ml hydrocortisone,and 5 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin. Murine brain microvascularendothelial cells (bEND-3) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eaglesmedium (DMEM GIBCO BRL) containing 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mML-glutamine and 5 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin. DNAzyme transfectionswere performed with FuGENE6 using subconfluent cells (60-70%) 6 h afterthe initiation of growth-arrest in serum-free medium. The cells weretransfected a second time in medium containing serum 18 h after theinitial transfection.

Western Blot Analysis

Growth-quiescent endothelial cells transfected twice with DNAzyme wereincubated in serum for 2 h prior to the preparation of total cellextracts in 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1% sodiumdeoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 5 mM EDTA, 10 μg/ml leupeptin,1% aprotinin and 2 mM PMSF. These extracts were resolved on 12% PAGEgels, transferred onto PVDF nylon membranes and probed with theindicated antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Proteins were detectedby chemiluminescence (NEN).

Preparation of Nuclear Extracts and EMSA

Cells were scraped into ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS),pelleted and resuspended in lysis buffer containing 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.9,1.5 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM KCl, 0.5% NP-40, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM PMSF, 4 μg/mlaprotinin and 10 μg/ml leupeptin. After incubation on ice for 5 min. thepellets were resuspended in 20 mM Hepes, pH7.9, 15 mM MgCl₂, 420 mMNaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM PMSF, 4 μg/ml aprotinin and 10 μg/mlleupeptin, shaking at low speed for 20 min. The supernatant was mixedwith an equal volume of 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 100 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA,20% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM PMSF, 4 μg/ml aprotinin and 10 μg/mlleupeptin. Double-stranded oligonucleotides were 5′-end-labeled with(γ³²P)ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase (NEB). Reactions were performedin the presence of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5 mMEDTA, 1 mM MgCl₂, 5% glycerol, 2.5 μg poly dI-dC with 150,000 cpm ofprobe for 20 min at room temperature. Bound complexes were resolved bynon-denaturing 8% PAGE in tris-borate-EDTA buffer system. For supershiftstudies nuclear extracts were incubated with 2 μg of c-Jun antibody 10min prior to the addition of the ³²P-labeled probe.

Endothelial Proliferation and Wounding Assays

Growth-quiescent endothelial cells treated with DNAzyme were incubatedin medium containing serum for 2 days prior to trypsinization,resuspension in Isoton II (Coulter Electronics) and quantitation using aCoulter counter (Coulter Z series). Endothelial cells transfected withDNAzyme were grown to confluence and injured by scraping with a P200tip. Two days after injury, the cells were washed twice in PBS, pH 7.4,fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (v/v), and stained in hematoxylin and eosinprior to photomicroscopy. Cell numbers in the denuded zone of each groupwere determined under 100× magnification in triplicate in a blindedmanner.

Microtubule Formation Assay

Endothelial cells were grown in 100 mm petri-dishes were transfectedwith DNAzyme then trypsinized and resuspended (30,000 cells per well)into 96 well plates coated with 100 μl of matrigel (BD Biosciences).Microtubule formation was quantified by microscopy under 400×magnification in a blinded manner.

HMEC-1 Migration and Invasion

Polycarbonate membranes (12 μm pore size) were coated overnight withmatrigel (1 mg/ml) (BD Biosciences) or collagen type I (1 mg/ml) (Sigma)and air-dried. A suspension of endothelial cells (4×10⁵/ml) previouslytransfected with DNAzyme was placed in the upper chamber of modifiedBoyden chambers. Media in the lower chamber was supplemented with FGF-2(20 ng/ml). After a 24 h incubation at 37° C., filters were fixed inmethanol, stained with hematoxylin and cells that had migrated to theunderside of the membrane were quantitated under 400× magnification.

RT-PCR

Cells were transfected with 0.4 μM of Dz13 or Dz13scr 6 h after arrest.Eighteen h later, the cells were incubated with TGF-betal (10 ng/ml,Promega) and transfected again with 0.4 μM Dz13 or Dz13scr. Total RNAwas prepared using Trizol (Invitrogen) after 24 h. Single strand cDNAwas synthesized from 4 μg total RNA in a 20-μl volume reaction with 200U reverse transcriptase (Superscript II), 500 μM dNTPs, and 0.5 μg oligo(dt)15 (Life Technologies). PCR was performed in a 20 μl volume with 1 UDNA polymerase, 100 μM dNTPs, 30 mM MgCl₂ (Invitrogen) and 0.1 μMprimers. MMP-2 PCR was performed at 95° C. for 30 s, 57° C. for 30 s,and 72° C. for 40 s over 22 cycles. The predicted MMP-2 amplificationproduct was 446 bp. cDNA samples were normalized to GAPDH (452 bpproduct). Primers were as follows:

(SEQ. ID NO: 15) MMP-2: Forward 5′-GGG ACA AGA ACC AGA TCA CAT AC-3′,(SEQ. ID NO: 16) Reverse 5′-CTT CTC AAA GTT GTA GGT GGT GG-3′;(SEQ. ID NO: 17) GAPDH: Forward 5′-ACC ACA GTC CAT GCC ATC AC-3′,(SEQ. ID NO: 18) Reverse 5′-TCC ACC ACC CTG TTG CTG TA-3′.MMP-2 ELISA

Endothelial cells transfected with DNAzyme were incubated with 10 ng/mlTGF-beta1 for 2 days in medium supplemented with 0.1% FBS. Conditionedmedia was harvested, centrifuged, normalized for equal protein, andlevels of MMP-2 determined using commercial ELISA (AmershamBiosciences).

SDS-PAGE and Gelatin Zymography

Bovine type B gelatin (Sigma) was impregnated into a standard 10% PAGEresolving gel mixture (4% stacking) at a final concentration of 1 mg/ml.Where indicated, endothelial cells transfected with DNAzyme wereco-transfected with 10 μg of a c-Jun expression vector. Equal amounts ofprotein were loaded and electrophoresis was performed at 4° C. Gels werethen soaked in 2.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma) and incubated in substratebuffer (50 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.6, 10 mM CaCl₂, and 0.02% NaN₃) overnightat 37° C. The gels were stained for 1 h in 0.2% Coomassie Blue R-250(Bio-Rad) in water, methanol and glacial acetic acid as 5:4:1, then gelswere finally destained to reveal gelatinolytic activity andphotographed.

Immunohistochemistry

Sections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human cutaneous malignantmelanoma in paraffin were stained with rabbit anti-peptide polyclonalantibodies to c-Jun or CD31 or goat anti-peptide antibodies to MMP-2, aspreviously described⁶⁶. Immunoreactivity was revealed followingincubation of the sections with either biotinylated-secondaryanti-rabbit or anti-goat antibody, as appropriate.

Rat Corneal Neovascularization Model

The corneas of 7 w.o. Sprague Dawley rats were implanted with 0.57 mmdiameter nitrocellulose filter disks that had previously been soaked forat least 30 min in 30 μM VEGF₁₆₅in 82 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.9). DNAzyme (100μg) or vehicle alone was subsequently administered into the conjunctivaadjacent to the disk following implantation. Corneas were carefullyremoved prior to quantitation of the (i) area of occupied byneovascularization (calculated as 0.2×π×clock hours occupied byvascularization×maximum vessel length) and (ii) the number of vesselsgrowing within the cornea 5 d after implantation.

Tumor Xenograft Mouse Models

B16F10 cells (5×10⁴) were injected s.c. into the dorsal midback regionof C57BL/J6 (6 w.o.) mice with 750 μg of DNAzyme in 200 μl of matrigel.Body weight and tumour dimensions were measured digitally at the timesindicated in the figure. Tumor volumes (mm³) were determined using theequation length×width×height×0.52.

Results

Dz13 Cleaves c-Jun RNA and Blocks Inducible c-Jun Expression in VascularSmooth Muscle Cells

Seven DNAzymes (FIG. 2A), bearing two nine nucleotide hybridising armsand a single 15 nt catalytic motif²⁷ targeting various regions of lowfree energy³¹ were evaluated for their capacity to cleave ³²P-labeled invitro transcribed c-Jun RNA. The seven DNAzymes and c-Jun transcriptwere first resolved by denaturing electrophoresis to ensure structuralintegrity (FIG. 2B). The 668 nt c-Jun transcript was cleaved by DNAzymesDz10, Dz12, Dz13, Dz14 and Dz15, but not by Dz9 and Dz11 within 1 h at37° C. under physiological conditions (FIG. 2B). One of the activeDNAzymes, Dz13, targeting the G¹³¹¹U junction (where the translationalstart site in human c-Jun mRNA is located at A¹²⁶¹UG), cleaved thetranscript within 15 min in both a time-dependent (FIG. 2C, upper panel)and dose-dependent (FIG. 2C, lower panel) manner, generating 474 and 194nt products. DNAzyme Dz13scr, in which the hybridizing arms of Dz13 werescrambled without disturbing the integrity of the catalytic domain,failed to cleave the substrate at any time or stoichiometric ratio (FIG.2C). To demonstrate Dz13 inhibition of endogenous c-Jun in primary humanarterial smooth muscle cells, we performed Western blot analysis ongrowth-quiescent cells previously transfected with 0.5 μM Dz13 orDz13scr and exposed to serum for 2 h at 37° C. Serum-inducible c-Junimmunoreactivity (39 kDa) was strongly inhibited by Dz13, whereas itsscrambled counterpart had no effect (FIG. 2D).

All of the c-Jun DNAzymes screened targeted regions in the mRNA likelyto be exposed in solution, based on a Zukerian prediction of regions oflow free energy in the mRNA, and preference for the 5′ end of the mRNA,where the translational apparatus attaches and moves along the chain.The present study shows that Zuker analysis does not guarantee theefficacy of any given DNAzyme in intact cells, since only some, but notall the DNAzyme sequences that cleave in vitro transcribed c-Jun mRNAcould actually inhibit cell proliferation. This may be due (although notconfined) to differences in conformation and site accessibility betweenin vitro transcribed mRNA and endogenous mRNA, DNAzyme transfectionefficiency, the concentration of ions and other DNAzyme cofactors in thelocal cellular millieu, and the possible existence of DNA-bindingproteins (such as growth factors, signalling molecules, etc) havingunintended preference for certain nucleotide sequences thereby reducingthe amount of bioavailable DNAzyme.

The inability of the Zuker analysis to accurately predict DNAzymeefficiency does not hinder the design of effective DNAzyme. Once aparticular target is selected, eg c-Jun it is a routine task to designand test a range of DNAzymes which target the particular mRNA, as shownin FIG. 2.

Dz13 Blocks Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation

We next determined the influence of Dz13 and the panel of c-Jun DNAzymeson the growth of primary vascular smooth muscle cells derived from humanand porcine arteries. The Dz13 target site in c-Jun RNA is conservedbetween human, pig and rat except for a single C nt at position 1319which is an A in pig and rat c-Jun RNA (FIG. 3A, upper and middlepanels). DNAzyme catalytic efficiency is largely unaffected bysubstitution of a single pyrimidine nt in the substrate with a purine³²,as in this case. Dz13 (0.5 μM) completely blocked serum-inducibleproliferation in both cell types (FIGS. 3B & C) and was the most potentof the entire DNAzyme panel. Dz13 inhibition was dose-dependent anddetectable at concentrations as low as 100 nM (FIG. 3D). In contrast,Dz13scr failed to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation (FIG. 3B),consistent with its inability to affect serum-inducible c-Jun protein(FIG. 2D). Surprisingly, some DNAzymes (Dz9, Dz11, Dz15) stimulatedproliferation beyond the effect of serum alone (FIGS. 3B & C).Additionally, Dz10, which cleaved the c-Jun transcript as effectively asDz13 (FIG. 2B) failed to modulate smooth muscle cell proliferation ineither cell type, unlike Dz13 (FIGS. 3B & C). To demonstrate greaterpotency of the c-Jun DNAzyme compared to its exact antisenseoligonucleotide counterpart, we generated As13 which, like Dz13,comprises a phosphodiester backbone and a 3′-3′ linked inverted T, buthas no catalytic core (FIG. 3A). As13 produced dose-dependentinhibition, however, Dz13 was twice as potent an inhibitor (FIG. 3D).

Dz13 Inhibits Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Repair After Injury in vitroand Intimal Thickening in Rat Carotid Arteries

Smooth muscle cell regrowth at the wound edge following mechanicalscraping in an in vitro model³³ was abolished by the presence of 0.5 μMDz13 (FIG. 4), whereas repair in the presence of Dz13scr was notdifferent from wells without oligonucleotide (FIG. 4). Since smoothmuscle cell proliferation and repair are processes negatively regulatedby Dz13, we next determined whether the c-Jun DNAzyme could influenceintimal thickening after ligation injury to rat carotid arteries. Thearterial response to injury in rats has provided critical insights onthe cellular and molecular events underlying the formation of lesions³⁴.Neointima formation three weeks after injury and local administration ofDz13scr was not significantly different from that observed in thevehicle alone group (FIGS. 5A & B). However, intimal thickening wassuppressed by Dz13 of the order of 60% (FIGS. 5A & B).Immunohistochemnical analysis revealed that Dz13 blocked the inductionof c-Jun immunoreactivity in the smooth muscle cells of the arterialmedia, whereas Dz13scr had no effect (FIG. 5C). In contrast, neitherDNAzyme had any influence on levels of Sp1 (FIG. 5C). Together, thesedata demonstrate a crucial role for c-Jun in smooth muscle cellproliferation, wound repair and neointima formation.

Arterial neointima formation has previously been inhibited byphosphorothioate-linked antisense oligonucleotides directed againstcertain transcription factors and cell cycle regulatory molecules,including the p65 subunit of NFκ-B³⁵, c-myb³⁶, c-myc³⁷, and cdc2kinase/proliferating-cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)³⁸. By directlycomparing a phosphodiester-linked DNAzyme with an antisenseoligonucleotide targeting the same sequence in c-Jun mRNA, each ofidentical arm length and bearing a 3′-3′-inverted T, this studydemonstrates superior inhibition by the former molecule at any givenconcentration. c-Jun DNAzymes could serve as new, more potentgene-specific tools to probe the precise function(s) of thistranscription factor in a wide array of fundamental cellular processes.

Since c-Jun has been implicated in the pathogenesis of otherfibroproliferative-inflammatory processes, such as arthritis³⁹,neoplasia⁴⁰, acute lung injury⁴¹, scarring⁴², UV-induced cornealdamage⁴³ and osteoperosis⁴⁴, DNAzymes targeting c-Jun and other keyregulatory molecules³³ may, alone or in combination, show promise inefforts to inhibit proliferative vascular disease and other pathologicalprocesses.

Involvement of c-Jun in Angiogenesis

Microvascular endothelial cells have become an important target incancer therapy, since angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels,is an absolute requirement for tumor cell growth and metastasis. It isalso a key process in the pathogenesis of other common human diseasessuch as arthritis and diabetic retinopathy. Angiogenesis is a complexprocesses involving endothelial cell proliferation, migration, andmicrotubule formation.

Dz13 Inhibits c-Jun Protein Expression, DNA-binding Activity, Migration,Proliferation and Tubule Formation by Microvascular Endothelial Cells.

c-Jun, unlike the zinc finger transcription factor Sp1, is poorlyexpressed in growth-quiescent human microvascular endothelial cells butis induced within 2 h of exposure to serum. Dz13, a DNAzyme targetingthe G¹³¹¹U junction in the coding region of human c-Jun mRNA, blockedc-Jun protein expression at a concentration of 0.4 μM. In contrast,c-Jun activation was not affected by the same concentration of Dz13scr,which bears the active catalytic domain of Dz13 flanked by scrambled 9+9nt arms but retaining the 3′-3′-linked inverted T that confersstability³³. As13, the antisense oligonucleotide counterpart of Dz13(including the 3′ inverted T) lacking the catalytic domain of theDNAzyme, also inhibited inducible c-Jun protein expression, whereas thescrambled version, As13scr, had no effect. Sp1 levels were not changedby any of the molecules tested (data not shown).

A faint nucleoprotein complex was produced following electrophoreticmobility shift analysis using a ³²P-labeled oligonucleotide bearing aconsensus binding element for c-Jun and nuclear extracts from quiescentmicrovascular endothelial cells. The intensity of this complex increasedwithin 2 h of exposure to serum. Inducible DNA-binding activity wasabolished either by Dz13 (0.4 μM) and preincubation of the extracts withc-Jun antibodies (2 μg), whereas Dz13scr had no effect (data not shown).

The preceding findings revealed the capacity of c-Jun DNAzymes to blockc-Jun protein expression and DNA-binding activity in a sequence-specificmanner. We next determined the effect of these molecules on endothelialtubule formation, proliferation and migration.

Endothelial cells spontaneously form a three-dimensional microtubularcapillary-like network on matrigel. Endothelial cells align on thematrigel and form cords within hours of plating. Dz13 blockedtubulogenesis in a dose-dependent manner (FIG. 6). This process wasunchanged by the presence of Dz13scr (FIG. 6). These findingsdemonstrate that c-Jun is required for endothelial network formation.The target site of Dz13 and other DNAzymes are shown in FIG. 7B.

Endothelial cell growth in the presence of serum was inhibited by Dz13(FIG. 8A) but not by Dz13scr (FIG. 8A). Dz13 inhibition wassequence-specific and dose-dependent maximal at 0.3 μM (FIG. 8B). As13also attenuated endothelial proliferation (FIG. 8A), although with lesspotency than the c-Jun DNAzyme at the same concentration (FIG. 8A),consistent with the effect of these agents on the expression of c-Jun.

To determine effect of arm length on the biological activity of Dz13,bearing 9+9 nt arms, we synthesized a nested series of DNAzymes with10+10, 11+11 and 8+8 nt arms (each with an 3′ inverted T), together withtheir scrambled arm counterparts. At a concentration of 0.4 μM,Dz13(11+11) and Dz13(8+8) inhibited endothelial proliferation aseffectively as native Dz13 (FIG. 8C). However, when these DNAzymes wereused at a lower concentration (0.2 μM), it became apparent thatDz13(11+11) and Dz13(8×8) were less potent inhibitors of endothelialproliferation than Dz13 (FIG. 8C). Dz13(10×10), in comparison to Dz13,Dz13(11×11) or Dz13(8×8), was a poor inhibitor.

Western blot analysis revealed that Dz13(11×11) and Dz13(8×8), likeDz13, inhibited serum-inducible c-Jun expression, whereas-Dz13(10×10),Dz13(11×11)scr and Dz13(8×8)scr had little effect. Reprobing thestripped blot with antibodies to Sp1 revealed unaltered levels of thisnuclear protein. In support of these data, Dz13(11×11) and Dz13(8×8),like Dz13, cleaved their 40 nt ³²P-labeled synthetic RNA substrate in atime-dependent manner, whereas Dz13(10×10), Dz13(11×11)scr andDz13(8×8)scr failed to cleave (data not shown).

To demonstrate a role for c-Jun in microvascular endothelial cellmigration, we scraped an endothelial monolayer in vitro and quantitatedthe population of cells in the denuded zone after 2 days, in the absenceand presence of DNAzyme. Dz13 inhibited this reparative response toinjury in a dose- and sequence-dependent manner. Modest inhibition ofregrowth was apparent in the presence of 0.2 μM Dz13 (FIG. 9A) withalmost complete inhibition observed at 0.4 μM (FIG. 9A). Dz13scr did notinterfere with endothelial regrowth in this concentration range (FIG.9A). These findings were confirmed using modified Boyden chambers coatedwith a reconstituted basement membrane (matrigel). Microvascularendothelial cell invasion through matrigel to the underside of themembrane was blocked 50% by Dz13 but not Dz13scr (FIG. 9B). Cellmigration through filters coated with collagen type I was greater thanwith matrigel and also inhibited by 50% by Dz13, but not Dz13scr (FIG.9B).

Dz13 Inhibits Microvascular Endothelial Cell MMP-2 mRNA, ProteinExpression and Proteolytic Activity.

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), proteinases that cleave basementmembrane and extracellular matrix molecules, are key to the process ofangiogenesis⁴⁵. For example, mice deficient in MMP-2 (also known asgelatinase A) have compromised tumor-inducible angiogenesis andprogression⁴⁶. We hypothesised that Dz13 activity is mediated by itscapacity to inhibit the expression of MMP-2. Assessment of MMP-2 mRNAand protein expression by semi-quantitative RT-PCR and enzyme-linkedimmunosorbent assay, respectively, demonstrated reduced MMP-2 expressionupon treatment with Dz13 but no change using Dz13scr (FIG. 10). Analysisof MMP-2 activity secreted into the culture medium by gelatin zymographyrevealed significantly reduced MMP-2 proteolysis of gelatin by Dz13,which was rescued by overexpression of c-Jun. There was no change inMMP-2 activity in the presence of Dz13scr. Gelatin zymographydemonstrated Dz13 inhibition of MMP-2 proteolysis and rescue byoverexpression of c-Jun cDNA (data not shown). RT-PCR demonstrated thatDz13 blocked c-Jun mRNA expression (data not shown).

Dz13 Inhibits VEGF₁₆₅-induced Neovascularization in Rat Cornea.

Corneal neovascularization is a sight-threatening condition usuallyassociated with inflammatory or infectious disorders⁴⁷. A hallmarkprocess in corneal disease is the invasion of blood vessels into what isnormally avascular tissue⁴⁸. We evaluated the capacity of Dz13 toinhibit angiogenesis in rat model of corneal neovascularization, aprocess involving MMP-2 expression⁴⁹. Implantation of vascularendothelial growth factor (VEGF)₁₆₅-soaked disks in the normallyavascular rat cornea stimulates new blood vessel growth from the limbustoward the implant within 5 days. This growth factor is also stronglyimplicated in the pathogenesis of human corneal neovascularization⁵⁰.Western blot analysis using polyclonal c-Jun antibodies and extracts ofgrowth-quiescent HMEC-1 cells pre-treated with DNAzyme (0.4 μM) 2 hafter exposure to VEGF₁₆₅ (100 μg/ml) demonstrated inhibition of c-Junexpression with no change in Sp1 expression (data not shown). Westernblot analysis demonstrates that VEGF₁₆₅ can induce c-Jun expression andthat this is blocked by Dz13 but not by Dz13scr (data not shown). Sp1levels were unchanged. Dz13 also inhibited VEGF₁₆₅-induciblemicrovascular tubule formation in vitro. Slit lamp biomicroscopicvisualization demonstrated that Dz13 blocked the corneal angiogenicresponse to VEGF₁₆₅ following its conjunctival administration in asequence-specific manner. Quantitative determination ofneovascularization revealed 81% inhibition in the number of bloodvessels (FIG. 11 A). Dz13 inhibited the corneal surface area occupied bythese new vessels by 74% (FIG. 11B).

Dz13 Inhibits Solid Melanoma Growth in Mice.

Aggressive melanoma lesions are associated with a significant increasein blood vessel density⁵¹. Previous studies have demonstrated that thein vivo growth of solid B16 melanoma is blocked by administration ofanti-Flk-1 monoclonal antibodies⁵² and MMP-2 inhibitors^(53,54)indicating the dependence of tumor growth on angiogenesis and matrixdegradation. Immunohistochemical analysis of primary human cutaneousmalignant melanoma demonstrates that c-Jun is strongly expressed inendothelial cell-specific CD31⁺ blood vessels and in surroundingmelanoma cells (data not shown). Intense cytoplasmic staining in bothcell types was also apparent using antibodies to MMP-2 (data not shown).c-Jun expression in primary melanoma has hitherto not been described.

Dz13 blocked solid B16 growth in C57BL/J6 mice in both a time-dependentand sequence-specific manner (FIG. 12A). The c-Jun DNAzyme inhibitedtumor growth by approximately 70% within 14 days, whereasDz13scr-treated tumors were indistinguishable from the vehicle group(FIG. 12A). Dz13 efficacy was not associated with any difference in bodyweight relative to the other treatment groups (FIG. 12B). There was alsono evidence of lethargy, ruffled fur, skin erythema, and soft faeces,consistent with the lack of a toxic effect. Dz13 blocked c-Jun proteinexpression (data not shown) and proliferation (FIG. 12C) of murinemicrovascular endothelial cells, whereas Dz13scr failed to inhibiteither process.

Strategies that target specific genes in complex biological milieu maybe achieved with synthetic agents including ribozymes, minizymes,antisense oligonucleotides, RNA interference and DNAzymes. DNAzymes havebeen used versatile tools that tease out the precise functions of thetargeted gene in a variety of cellular processes⁵⁵. These molecules havealso been used as inhibitors of restenosis and in-stent restenosis,processes involving vascular smooth muscle cell hyperplasia^(33,56,57).This study has shown that DNAzymes targeting c-Jun can serve as potentinhibitors of microvascular endothelial cell mitogenesis, migration,corneal neovascularization and solid tumor growth. Accordingly, weprovide here the first direct evidence for the key role of c-Jun inangiogenesis.

It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that numerousvariations and/or modifications may be made to the invention as shown inthe specific embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope ofthe invention as broadly described. The present embodiments are,therefore, to be considered in all respects as illustrative and notrestrictive.

References

-   1. Ross, R., Glomset, J. A., Kariya, B. & Harker, L. A    platelet-dependent serum factor that stimulates the proliferation of    arterial smooth muscle cells in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA    71, 1207-1210 (1974).-   2. Miano, J. M., Tota, R. R., Vlasic, N., Danishefsky, K. J. &    Stemerman, M. B. Early proto-oncogene expression in rat aortic    smooth muscle cells following endothelial removal. Am. J. Pathol.    137, 761-765 (1990).-   3. Watson, L. et al. JNK and c-Jun but not ERK and c-Fos are    associated with sustained neointima-formation after balloon injury.    Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 30,11-17 (2000).-   4. Wagner, E. F. AP-1. Oncogene 20, 2334-2335 (2001).-   5. Kanatani et al., Transforming growth factor beta and    dexamethasone cooperatively enhance c-Jun gene expression and    inhibit the growth of human monocytoid leukemia cells. Cell Growth    Differ 1996;7:187-196.-   6. Nishio, H., Matsui, K., Tsuji, H. & Suzuki, K.    Immunohistochemical study of the phosphoylated and activated form of    c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase in human aorta. Histochem. J. 33, 167-171    (2001).-   7. Metzler, B., Hu, Y., Dietrich, H. & Xu, Q. Increased expression    and activation of stress-activated protein kinases/c-Jun    NH2-terminal protein kinases in atherosclerotic lesions coincide    with p53. Am. J Pathol. 156, 1875-1886 (2000).-   8. Izumi, Y. et al. Gene transfer of dominant-negative mutants of    extracellular signal-regulated kinase and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase    prevents neointimal formation in balloon-injured rat artery. Circ.    Res. 88(2001).-   9. Silverman et al., Vascular smooth muscle cells express the    transcriptional corepressor NAB2 in response to injury. Am J Pathol    1999;155:1311-1317.-   10. Khachigian et al., GC factor 2 represses platelet-derived growth    factor A-chain gene transcription and is itself induced by arterial    injury. Circ Res. 1999;11;84:1258-1267.-   11. Santiago et al., Induction of the transcriptional repressor Yin    Yang-1 by vascular cell injury. Autocrine/paracrine role of    endogenous fibroblast growth factor-2. J Biol Chem.    2001;276:41143-1149.-   12. Pessah et al., c-Jun interacts with the corepressor    TG-interacting factor (TGIF) to suppress Smad2 transcriptional    activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:6198-6203.-   13. Dennler et al., c-Jun inhibits transforming growth factor    beta-mediated transcription by repressing Smad3 transcriptional    activity. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:28858-28865.-   14. Hanahan, D., and Folkman, J. (1996). Patterns and emerging    mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis. Cell 86,    353-364.-   15. Haseloff, J., Gerlach, W. L. (1988) Nature (334):585-591.-   16. Breaker, R. R. and Joyce, G. (1994) Chemistry and Biology    1:223-229.-   17. Koizumi, M., et al. (1989) Nucleic Acids Research 17:7059-7069.-   18. Otsuka and Koizumi JP4235919.-   19. Kashani-Sabet, M., et al. (1992) Antisense Research and    Development 2:3-15.-   20. Raillard, S. A. and Joyce, G. F. (1996) Biochemistry    35:11693-11701.-   21. Carmi, N., et al. (1996) Chemistry and Biology 3:1039-1046.-   22. Symons, R. H. (1992) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61, 641-671.-   23. Sun, L. Q., et al. (1997) Mol. Biotechnology 7:241-251.-   24. Pan, T. and Uhlenbeck, O. C. (1996) Biochemistry 31:3887-3895.-   25. Tsang, J. and Joyce, G. F. (1994) Biochemistry 33:5966-5973.-   26. Breaker, R. R. and Joyce, G. F. (1995) Chem. Biol. 2, 655-660.-   27. Santoro, S. W. & Joyce, G. F. A general purpose RNA-cleaving DNA    enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 4262-4266 (1997).-   28. Kuwabara, T. et al. Comparison of the specificities and    catalytic activities of hammerhead ribozymes and DNA enzymes with    respect to the cleavage of BCR-ABL chimeric L6 (b2a2) mRNA. Nucleic    Acid Res. 25, 3074-3091 (1997).-   29. Chiang et al. (1996) J Biol Chem 271:23999.-   30. Lowe, H. C. et al. Catalytic oligodeoxynucleotides define a    critical regulatory role for early growth response factor-1 in the    porcine coronary artery model of in-stent restenosis. Circulation    Research 89, 670-677 (2001).-   31. Zuker, M. On finding all suboptirnal foldings of an RNA    molecule. Science 244, 48-52 (1989).-   32. Santoro, S. W. & Joyce, G. F. Mechanism and utility of an    RNA-cleaving DNA enzyme. Biochemistry 37, 13330-13342 (1998).-   33. Santiago, F. S. et al. New DNA enzyme targeting Egr-1 mRNA    inhibits vascular smooth muscle proliferation and regrowth factor    injury. Nature Med. 11, 1264-1269 (1999).-   34. Clowes, A. W., Reidy, M. A. & Clowes, M. M. Kinetics of cellular    proliferation after arterial injury. Lab. Invest. 49, 327-333    (1983).-   35. Autieri, M. V., Yue, T.-L., Ferstein, G. Z. & Ohlstein, E.    Antisense oligonucleotides to the p65 subunit of NF-kB inhibit human    vascular smooth muscle cell adherence and proliferation and prevent    neointima formation in rat carotid arteries. Biochem. Biophys. Res.    Commun. 213, 827-836 (1995).-   36. Simons, M., Edelman, E. R., DeKeyser, J.-L., Langer, R. &    Rosenberg, R. Antisense c-myb oligonucleotides inhibit intimal    arterial smooth muscle cell accumulation in vivo. Nature 359, 67-70    (1992).-   37. Bennett, M. R. et al. Inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell    proliferation in vitro and in vivo by c-myc antisense    oligodeoxynucleotides. J. Clin. Invest. 93, 820-828 (1994).-   38. Morishita, R. et al. Single intraluminal delivery of antisense    cdc2 kinase and proliferating-cell nuclear antigen oligonucleotides    results in chronic inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia. Proc. Natl.    Acad. Sci. USA 90, 84748478 (1993).-   39. Wakisaka, S. et al. Involvement of simultaneous multiple    transcription factor expression, including cAMP responsive element    binding protein and OCT-1, for synovial cell outgrowth in patients    with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 57, 487-494 (1998).-   40. van Dam, H. & Castellazzi, M. Distinct roles of Jun:Fos and    Jun:ATF dimers in oncogenesis. Oncogene 20, 2453-2464 (2001).-   41. Chen, B. et al. Mesenchymal cells isolated after acute lung    injury manifest an enhanced proliferative phenotype. J. Clin.    Invest. 90, 1778-1785 (1992).-   42. Kondo, T., Ohshima, T., Sato, Y., Mayama, T. & Eisenmenger, W.    Immunohistochemical study on the expression of c-Fos and c-Jun in    human skin wounds. Histochem. J. 32,509-514 (2000).-   43. Gillardon, F., Zimmermann, M. & Uhlmann, E. Expression of c-Fos    and c-Jun in the cornea, lens, and retina after ultraviolet    irradiation of the rat eye and effects of topical antisense    oligodeoxynucleotides. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 79, 277-281 (1995).-   44. Shevde, N. K., Bendixen, A. C., Dienger, K. M. & Pike, J. W.    Estrogens suppress RANK ligand-induced osteoclast differentiation    via a stromal cell independent mechanism involving c-Jun repression.    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97,7829-7834 (2000).-   45. Haas, T. L., and Madri, J. A. (1999). Extracellular    matrix-driven matrix metalloproteinase production in endothelial    cells: implications for angiogenesis. Trends Cardiovasc. Med.    9,70-77.-   46. Itoh, T., Tanioka, M., Yoshida, H., Yoshioka, T., Nishimoto, H.,    and Itohara, S. (1998). Reduced angiogenesis and tumor progression    in gelatinase A-deficient mice. Cancer Res. 58, 1048-1051.-   47. Chang, J. H., Gabison, E. E., Kato, T., and Azar, D. T. (2001).    Corneal neovascularization. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 12, 242-249.-   48. Klintworth, G. K. (1977). The contribution of morphology to our    understanding of the pathogenesis of experimentally produced corneal    vascularization. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 16, 281-285.-   49. Kvanta, A., Sarman, S., Fagerholm, P., Seregard, S., and    Steen, B. (2000). Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2)    and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in    inflammation-associated corneal neovascularization. Exp Eye Res 70,    419-428.-   50. Lai, C. M., Spilsbury, K., Brankov, M., Zaknich, T., and    Rakoczy, P. E. (2002). Inhibition of corneal neovascularization by    recombinant adenovirus mediated antisense VEGF RNA. Exp Eye Res. 75,    625-634.-   51. de Waal, R. M., van Altena, M. C., Erhard, H., Weidle, U. H.,    Nooijen, P. T., and Ruiter, D. J. (1997). Lack of lymphangiogenesis    in human primary cutaneous melanoma. Consequences for the mechanism    of lymphatic dissemination. Am. J. Pathol. 150, 1951-1957.-   52. Prewett, M., Huber, J., Li, Y., Santiago, A., O'Connor, W.,    King, K., Overholser, J., Hooper, A., Pytowski, B., Witte, L,    Bohlen, P., and Hicklin, D. J. (1999). Antivascular endothelial    growth factor receptor (fetal liver kinase 1) monoclonal antibody    inhibits tumor angiogenesis and growth of several mouse and human    tumors. Cancer Res. 59, 5209-5218.-   53. Maekawa, R., Maki, H., Yoshida, H., Hojo, K., Tanaka, H., Wada,    T., Uchida, N., Takeda, Y., Kasai, H., Okamoto, H., Tsuzuki, H.,    Kambayashi, Y., Watanabe, F., Kawada, K., Toda, K., Ohtani, M.,    Sugita, K., and Yoshioka, T. (1999). Correlation of antiangiogenic    and anti tumor efficacy of N-biphenyl sulfonyl-phenylalanine    hydroxiamic add (BPHA), an orally-active, selective matrix    metalloproteinase inhibitor. Cancer Res 59, 1231-1235.-   54. Shalinsky, D. R., Brekken, J., Zou, H., McDermott, C. D.,    Forsyth, P., Edwards, D., Margosiak, S., Bender, S., Truitt, G.,    Wood, A., Varki, N. M., and Appelt, K. (1999). Broad antitumor and    antiangiogenic activities of AG3340, a potent and selective MMP    inhibitor undergoing advanced oncology clinical trials. Ann N Y Acad    Sd 878, 236-270.-   55. Khachigian, L. M. (2002). DNAzymes: cutting a path to a new    class of therapeutics. Curr. Opin. Mol. Therap. 4, 119-121.-   56. Lowe, H. C., Fahmy, R. G., Kavurma, M. M., Baker, A.,    Chesterman, C. N., and Khachigian, L. M. (2001). Catalytic    oligodeoxynucleotides define a key regulatory role for early growth    response factor-1 in the porcine model of coronary in-stent    restenosis. Circulation Research 89,670-677.-   57. Lowe, H. C., Chesterman, C. N., and Khachigian, L. M. (2002).    Catalytic antisense DNA molecules targeting Egr-1 inhibit neointima    formation following permanent ligation of rat common cartoid    arteries. Thromb. Haemost. 87, 134-140.

1. A method of reducing ocular angiogenesis in a subject, the methodcomprising administering to the eye of the subject a pharmaceuticalcomposition comprising an effective dose of a DNAzyme targeted againstc-Jun, wherein the DNAzyme has the sequence of SEQ ID NO:5.
 2. Themethod according to claim 1 wherein the DNAzyme incorporates a 3′-3′inversion at the 3′ terminus.